I’ve been playing quite a bit more of Splinter Cell: Conviction. Thankfully, I’ve been finding the game a lot easier than I did early on. Part of it has to do with getting used to the flow of things in a more stealth-based game.
I had noted in my “First Look” post that the enemies do a decent job focusing on the “last known position” mechanic that the game is proud of. To explain, when you are sighted and then go back into cover, the game draws a black and white line art model of your position when you were last seen. This is meant to be a marker of where the enemy thinks you are. The encouraged play is to separate yourself from that point so that you can either hide elsewhere or flank and surprise them. This is a helpful reminder and is only made possible by the fact that the AI has a mental model of your position other than the old fashioned “omniscient” method that games used to use.
Again, they do a good job of searching for youâ€”whether at your actual location or your believed one. They will use cover, approach cautiously, and when the discover you aren’t really there, start to search in what looks like a meaningful way. This is where the problem occurs, however.
|The enemies will begin to search the entire area even when they should know
that you are not in those places.
In some instances, when they find that you aren’t where they thought you were, there could be many directions or places to which you could have escaped. At other times, however, there are very few optionsâ€”or even only one optionâ€”that you could have selected. However, the enemies will begin to search the entire area even when they should know that you are not in those places.
One example I saw that was glaring was when I had engaged enemies from a door to their room. I never actually entered the room but rather was firing from the doorway. Eventually, outgunned as I was, it was in my best interests to retreat into the room that I had come from. As I moved away, the line artÂ silhouetteÂ marked me as still being crouched next to the door. I watched as they came up to the door to attack where they thought I was. Upon discovering me, however, they exclaimed something or other about losing me… and began searching their own room! They had been watching the doorway the whole time and should have known that I had never crossed to their side of it. The logical conclusion should have been that I was on my side of the door. The result was that I was able to slowlyÂ re-assaultÂ their position because they were no longer wary of me in the direction of my approach. Good for my survival; bad for my suspension of disbelief.
|Good for my survival; bad for my
suspension of disbelief.
The solution to this problem is to leverage “occupancy maps”. The concept has been around for a while but very much came to the game dev forefront whenÂ DamiĂˇn Isla gave an excellent presentation on it at the GDC AI Summit in 2009. The idea is based on the concept of influence maps where the grid space values represent the probability that a target is there. Obviously, if you can see a location, then the target is not there. You then simply spread the probabilities over the areas that he could have gone. By selecting the highest grid value at any one time, you are, by definition, going to the most likely place that the target could be. The result is a spectacular mimicry of how people (and animals for that matter) search for something that disappeared from site.
This method is slightly more memory and processor intensive than simply having a shared (x,y,z) location for the last known position of the player. I honestly don’t know if they had resources to burn in the game. However, I have to wonder if they even thought of trying the approach. I wish they had, though. An otherwise well-done stealth based game would have been that much better for their efforts.